ad
ad

ByPass The Best 5 AI Detectors

Science & Technology

Introduction

In today's video, I tested five different AI detectors to determine how effectively they can identify AI-generated content. To establish a benchmark, I compared their scores with Originality, a widely-used tool known for reliable detection of AI writing. Here's a breakdown of the detectors I used:

  1. GPT Z: This detector is particularly aimed at educational institutions, designed to catch AI-generated text.
  2. Content at Scale Detector: Aimed at marketers, this tool ensures that their content remains original.
  3. CopyLeaks Detector: Popular among businesses, this detector focuses on maintaining content legitimacy.
  4. QuillBot Detector: This versatile tool can identify AI-generated content across various formats, making it appealing for publishers.
  5. Sapling AI Detector: Known for assisting writers in maintaining quality in their work.

To add complexity to the test, I utilized the Fasley AI tool, which humanizes content to see how well the detectors can pinpoint AI writing even after it has been altered. I have been using Fasley for a while, and it does a commendable job of making AI content appear more human-like.

Let's proceed to see how each detector performed both before and after humanization.

Testing Process

Initial Scan

First, I generated text using ChatGPT and copied it to Originality for an initial scan. Here are the results:

  • Originality: Scored 100% AI and had 10% plagiarism.

Next, I checked the other detectors:

  • GPT Z: Detected 100% AI.
  • Content at Scale Detector: Indicated a gradient of AI generation without a specific percentage, suggesting some AI characteristics.
  • CopyLeaks: Identified the content as 100% AI.
  • QuillBot: Also detected 100% AI.
  • Sapling: Confirmed as 100% AI.

After Humanization

Next, I humanized the text using the Pro version of Fasley, which offers advanced capabilities for generating varied outputs while maintaining meaning. I then scanned this altered text with the detectors again:

  • Originality: Reported it as 100% human with 0% plagiarism.
  • GPT Z: Found it mostly human but indicated a 3% likelihood of AI generation.
  • Content at Scale: Suggested an 80% human score based on a color gradient.
  • CopyLeaks: Identified it as likely human.
  • QuillBot: Confirmed 100% human content with 0% AI detection.
  • Sapling: Initially encountered issues, but subsequent attempts verified it as 0% AI.

Conclusion

Overall, the performance of the detectors varied when identifying AI-generated content. Most notably, CopyLeaks, QuillBot, and Sapling showed results that closely aligned with Originality after humanization.

If you're interested in testing these AI detection tools, the links can be found in the description below. For any comments or questions regarding AI detection or humanizing content, feel free to reach out!

Keywords

AI detectors, AI-generated content, Originality, GPT Z, Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, QuillBot, Sapling, humanized text, Fasley AI.

FAQ

Q: What are the best tools for detecting AI-generated content?
A: The best tools for detecting AI-generated content include GPT Z, Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, QuillBot, and Sapling.

Q: How does humanization of AI content affect detection?
A: Humanization makes AI content appear more natural, which can make it difficult for detectors to identify it as generated by AI.

Q: What was the purpose of using Fasley in the tests?
A: Fasley was used to humanize the AI-generated text to see how well the detectors could identify changes made to the content.

Q: Are there reliable scores for AI detection?
A: Yes, tools like Originality provide reliable scores for identifying AI content, which can be compared with other detectors for accuracy.

Q: Can I try these AI detection tools?
A: Yes, links to all the mentioned AI detection tools are available in the description for you to explore.