Former CIA Officer Amaryllis Fox Kennedy: Iraq, JFK, & Everything Else Our Intel Agencies Lie About
News & Politics
Introduction
Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, a former CIA officer and political advocate, has raised alarms regarding U.S. foreign policy and intelligence operations, particularly concerning Ukraine, Iraq, and historical events like the assassinations of the 1960s.
In a recent discussion, Fox argued that the Biden-Harris administration has manipulated the political landscape of Ukraine, preventing peace agreements that could have preserved significant portions of the nation's territory. She contends that the motivations behind U.S. involvement in Ukraine are driven by the quest for control over resources, military profits, and power, rather than genuine support for the Ukrainian people. The sacrifice of Ukrainian lives as part of this geopolitical game was sharply criticized by Fox, emphasizing the moral implications of prolonging conflict for profit.
Fox also drew parallels between U.S. foreign policy and domestic governance, suggesting that actions taken abroad, like the overthrow of democratically elected governments, have paved the way for similar undemocratic approaches at home. She highlighted examples where U.S. intelligence agencies have historically involved themselves in undermining democratic processes and shaping narratives in ways that favor specific political agendas.
Reflecting on her background, Fox recounted her path from a post-9/11 world into the CIA, where she believed in the potential for intelligence to prevent conflict. Yet, she expressed disillusionment upon witnessing the agency's use for promoting war and engaging in morally questionable operations.
Touching on the dangers posed by electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks as a result of negligence and lack of preparedness, Fox described how both natural events like solar flares and weaponized EMPs could lead to catastrophic consequences for the U.S. infrastructure and civilians. She noted President Trump’s attempt to address EMP vulnerabilities, which was revoked by President Biden, calling such decisions perplexing and harmful.
Fox’s deep concern over the mainstream media's lack of coverage on critical issues, including interference in elections and the deterioration of civil liberties, is underscored. She stressed the importance of independent media and truthfulness to preserve democracy and accountability in governance.
Her experience managing Bobby Kennedy Jr.'s presidential campaign allowed her to witness the media's focused disapproval of candidates who challenge the establishment. Fox argues that the media has become an extension of corporate interests, thus failing to fulfill its role in democratic society as a check on power.
A staunch advocate for free speech and critical thinking, Fox believes that the preservation of these values is crucial for future generations. She emphasizes the role that all citizens must play in upholding constitutional rights and resisting the corporate and political forces that seek to diminish them.
Keywords
U.S. foreign policy, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, Ukraine, Biden-Harris administration, intelligence agencies, Iraq War, EMP attacks, media manipulation, free speech, civil liberties.
FAQ
Q1: What is Amaryllis Fox Kennedy's perspective on U.S. involvement in Ukraine?
A1: Fox believes that U.S. involvement in Ukraine is primarily driven by the desire for resource control and military profits, arguing that it has resulted in unnecessary loss of life for the Ukrainian people.
Q2: How does Fox relate U.S. foreign policy to domestic governance?
A2: She suggests that undemocratic actions taken abroad, such as the overthrowing of elected governments, have led to similar methods being applied within the U.S., undermining democracy at home.
Q3: What concerns did Fox express regarding potential EMP attacks?
A3: Fox highlighted the vulnerabilities of U.S. infrastructure to EMP attacks, detailing how a lack of preparation could result in catastrophic consequences for civilians and the nation as a whole.
Q4: What is Fox's view on the mainstream media?
A4: Fox criticizes mainstream media for being complicit in corporate interests, failing to provide the coverage necessary to hold governments accountable and informing the public about critical issues.
Q5: What does Fox advocate for regarding free speech and democracy?
A5: Fox champions the need to protect free speech and critical thinking to ensure the future preservation of democracy and individual liberties for coming generations.