OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus vs Google's Gemini Advanced. Which $20 AI chatbot is best?

Science & Technology

Introduction

The landscape of AI chatbots is rapidly evolving, and today, we are putting OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus against Google's Gemini Advanced. Both platforms offer unique features and capabilities, but they are not without their flaws. Our aim is to explore how these chatbots perform under real-world scenarios such as finding and modifying recipes, researching travel, and drafting emails.

Subscription and Features

Both chatbots are available for a monthly fee of $ 20. OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus subscription grants access to ChatGPT-4, advanced image generation tools, higher usage limits, and early access to new features. Meanwhile, Google’s Gemini Advanced subscription gives users access to its 1.5 Pro chatbot, features like Image FX, documentation for image upload and analysis, code editing, and 2 terabytes of Google One storage.

A significant difference between the two is their context windows: ChatGPT-4 can manage 8,192 tokens, while Gemini Advanced impressively handles up to 1 million tokens.

Recipe Testing: Fusion Dishes

A creative way to test these chatbots is to request intricate recipes that blend different culinary traditions. For instance, I prompted both systems to generate a churro recipe with a Thai twist and a dash of pumpkin spice.

ChatGPT's Response: ChatGPT provided a recipe that included traditional churro ingredients but suggested a Thai coconut dipping sauce to accompany it. This was a deviation from my original request but still an interesting suggestion.

Gemini Advanced's Response: Gemini, on the other hand, recommended adding pumpkin puree along with traditional spices and even suggested a Thai-inspired coating on the churro itself. This approach was more aligned with my request.

Each chatbot presented a unique take, indicating that both are capable of generating creative culinary ideas, though they approached the task differently.

Product Recommendations: Mid-Range Turntables

Next, I searched for mid-range turntables available in red without a built-in phono preamp.

ChatGPT's Recommendations: ChatGPT offered options like the Project Debut Carbon Evo, U-Turn Audio Orbit Special, and Reg Audio Plan R1. However, it inaccurately included the Reg Audio Plan R1 despite its limited color options.

Gemini Advanced's Recommendations: Gemini suggested the Project Debut Carbon Evo and the Reg Audio Plan R1 Plus but correctly noted that the latter does not come in red. It also included the Fluance RT82, which is also unavailable in red.

In this round, while ChatGPT gave more recommendations, Gemini Advanced provided more accurate color information.

Travel Itinerary: Festus, Missouri

To assess their knowledge of lesser-known locations, I asked both chatbots for travel itineraries for Festus, Missouri.

ChatGPT's Itinerary: ChatGPT recommended having breakfast at a local brewery and lunch at a Mexican restaurant known to a colleague from the area. While the recommendations were somewhat generic, they had a local flavor.

Gemini Advanced's Itinerary: Ironically, Gemini recommended heading to a hotel and visiting nearby St. Louis for a historical museum, shifting focus away from Festus itself.

Both chatbots succeeded in suggesting nearby activities, but Gemini Advanced's suggestions leaned more towards major attractions.

Email Composition: Taking Time Off

I tested how well each chatbot could draft a professional yet festive email requesting time off for a religious holiday.

ChatGPT's Email: ChatGPT produced an email with a friendly tone, adding emojis and exclamation marks, which made it suitable for a more casual context.

Gemini Advanced's Email: Gemini offered a structured email beginning with "Eid Mubarak," effectively incorporating cultural relevance by suggesting sharing traditional sweets with colleagues, though it lacked emojis.

Both emails were adequate, with ChatGPT offering a more playful tone whereas Gemini maintained a professional demeanor.

Article Summarization

Finally, I tasked both bots with summarizing a lengthy review article I had written.

ChatGPT's Summary: ChatGPT delivered a quick summary that echoed my language and captured key points, although it occasionally mischaracterized my opinions.

Gemini Advanced's Summary: Gemini similarly produced a good summary with effective condensation of the original article.

Both AI models showcased decent summation skills yet could improve in distinguishing the author's tone better.

Conclusion

Testing the capabilities of both ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced is quite revealing. The outcomes can vary based on the time of day and nature of the questions posed. ChatGPT often delivers more elaborate responses while Gemini Advanced tends to be more accurate, though it sometimes provides fewer recommendations. In conclusion, while both chatbots have their strengths and weaknesses, ChatGPT seems to hold the edge in overall conversational quality.

Keywords

  • AI chatbots
  • OpenAI ChatGPT Plus
  • Google Gemini Advanced
  • subscription
  • features
  • recipe testing
  • product recommendations
  • travel itinerary
  • email composition
  • article summarization

FAQ

1. What is the subscription cost for ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced?
Both ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced are available for $ 20 per month.

2. What are the main features of ChatGPT Plus?
ChatGPT Plus provides access to ChatGPT-4, advanced image generation tools, higher usage limits, and early access to new features.

3. How do the context windows of the two chatbots differ?
ChatGPT-4 can handle 8,192 tokens, while Gemini Advanced can manage up to 1 million tokens.

4. How did ChatGPT and Gemini perform in recipe creation?
Both chatbots provided different approaches to a fusion churro recipe, showcasing their unique strengths in creativity.

5. Which chatbot provided more accurate product recommendations?
Gemini Advanced showed more accuracy in providing correct color options for turntables.

6. How effective were the chatbots in drafting emails?
Both chatbots produced acceptable emails, though their tones differed, with ChatGPT being more casual and Gemini Advanced more professional.

7. How did they perform with summarizing a lengthy article?
Both chatbots effectively summarized a lengthy article, though they occasionally misrepresented the author’s tone.