Suno, Udio (and other music AI). We're F*ED and it's really BAD. Seriously.

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made remarkable strides in various fields, but one area where its impact is particularly alarming is music creation. Recently, music-generating AI technologies, such as Suno and other platforms, have begun to threaten the livelihoods of musicians and composers, particularly in the stock music market. As these AI tools can produce high-quality music quickly and at a minimal cost, it raises serious questions about the future of human creators in the music industry.

The Rise of AI Music

Suno AI, for instance, offers a service where users can generate 500 music tracks per month for merely $ 10. This translates to an astonishing two cents for each track. The implications of this are dire for musicians who rely on selling their works. For a skilled creator, writing, recording, and producing even a short piece of music can take a whole day, often selling for a much higher price than the cents AI platforms charge.

The quality of AI-generated music is also not what it once was. Initially, these creations were often rudimentary, but as technology advances, the results are becoming increasingly polished and sophisticated. Suno AI can produce tracks with intricate melodies and lyrics that sometimes rival those crafted by human musicians.

The Effect on the Music Industry

As the capabilities of AI continue to improve, it’s not just stock music that may face extinction; the entire commercial music sector is at risk. Corporate clients are likely to favor these AI tools, as they prioritize speed and budget over the emotional nuance and depth that human musicians bring.

The result is that human creators face a bleak outlook—one where their work, passion, and the essence of their existence can be rendered obsolete by AI. To compound this issue, there isn’t a strong enough network among artists to protest against these developments. Artists do not form unions like miners, farmers, and doctors. Thus, there are no effective means to raise awareness or take action against this looming threat.

Renowned figures, like Noam Chomsky, have pointed out that generative AI can be seen as a form of plagiarism. It feeds off human creativity and reproduces it in a way that diminishes the original work's value. Essentially, creators are being robbed of their efforts, as AI flattens their unique musical styles into commodity versions that are just cheap enough for mass consumption.

The Human Element of Music

Despite these challenges, the intrinsic drive to create music will persist. For many individuals, making music is a passion that transcends commercial motives. The bond between creators and their audience remains irreplaceable; AI may produce sound, but human experience, emotion, and connection will always be at the heart of genuine artistry.

The landscape of music creation is changing dramatically, and while it’s imperative to adapt to these shifts, it’s equally essential to recognize the value and irreplaceable nature of human creativity. The future may seem bleak for stock music creators in particular, but those motivated by passion will continue to produce, even if the conditions are harsh.

Conclusion

The rapid advancements in music-generating AI signify not just an evolution in technology, but a potential crisis for human composers. With the state of the music industry shifting, many creators may find themselves sidelined while machines take the stage. It is crucial to pay attention to these developments and advocate for the value of human creativity in an increasingly mechanized world.

Keyword

AI music, Suno, stock music, music creators, Noam Chomsky, generative AI, emotional connection, human creativity, music industry.

FAQ

Q: What is Suno AI?
A: Suno AI is a music-generating platform that allows users to create a vast number of music tracks at a very low cost.

Q: How does AI-generated music impact human musicians?
A: AI-generated music presents a significant threat to human musicians, particularly in the stock music market, where speed and cost-efficiency are prioritized over human artistry.

Q: Why is generative AI considered a form of plagiarism?
A: Some experts, including Noam Chomsky, argue that generative AI effectively "steals" from existing human works by generating new content based on previously existing pieces, thereby undermining original creativity.

Q: Can human musicians still find a way to thrive in a world dominated by AI?
A: While challenging, many musicians will continue to pursue their passion for creating music, emphasizing the unique emotional connection they have with their audience, which AI cannot replicate.

Q: What can be done to address the threat of AI in the music industry?
A: Artists and musicians may need to organize and advocate for the recognition and value of human creativity to ensure their work remains meaningful in a rapidly changing landscape.