VIDEO?GEN.CIRIMWAMI AGIYE KWIRUKANWA GOMA N'UBUYOBOZI BWE BWA GISIRKARE, ABADEPITE BAFASHE IMYANZURO
News & Politics
Introduction
In a recent meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the ongoing state of siege in the National Assembly, particularly since the resolution voted on September 29, 2021, to lift the siege has not been respected. Despite multiple calls from dignitaries in the two provinces to lift it, the situation has continuously worsened. The number of internally displaced persons has risen, and it appears that the state of siege has turned into a revenue-generating enterprise for military officials on the ground.
The assembly highlighted a noticeable disconnect between the local population and military officers. Allegations are surfacing that military personnel are engaging in illegal mining operations to fund their actions rather than protecting the community. Moreover, substantial military traffic has been recorded involving armed groups and rebels, suggesting complicity between certain army officers and these factions.
A plea was made to help restore order and peace in the Republic, emphasizing the need for frank discussions that would pave the way for sensible recommendations. The discourse underscored that peace does not only depend on the existence of a state of siege; the army is prepared to fight regardless of its status.
The situation in Ituri Province is particularly alarming, with militarized accusations against the civilian population, alleging that they are a part of armed groups. The continuous arrests without resolution contribute to a growing humanitarian crisis, as recent reports indicated an alarming rise in fatalities, including over 14 deaths due to escalating violence.
The assembly members stressed that they should not be treated as mere pawns or mouthpieces for anyone within the government structure. They asserted their right to be heard, emphasizing that they were elected to advocate for their constituents. They expressed frustration over the inability to discuss important bills and emphasized that the ongoing state of siege has failed to yield any positive outcomes—no city has been reclaimed since its implementation.
As tensions grow, the assembly representatives vowed to take action, stating that they should not wait for the aggressors to infringe upon their territory. The message was clear: they are ready to fight for their mandate and their people's safety.
Keywords
- State of siege
- National Assembly
- Military conflict
- Internally displaced persons
- Illegal mining
- Ituri Province
- Civilian accusations
- Humanitarian crisis
- Elected representatives
FAQ
Q: What is the main concern addressed by the National Assembly representatives?
A: The representatives are primarily concerned about the ongoing state of siege that has not been lifted despite calls for its removal, leading to increased violence and displacement in various provinces.
Q: How has the state of siege affected the relationship between the military and civilians?
A: There appears to be a significant conflict between the local population and military officers, with allegations that the military is engaging in illegal activities and mismanaging their responsibilities towards the civilians.
Q: What specific problems has the Ituri Province faced during this period?
A: Ituri Province has experienced heightened tensions with the military, leading to accusations that entire civilian populations are part of armed groups, causing numerous arrests and contributing to escalating violence.
Q: What actions do the assembly members intend to take if the situation does not improve?
A: The assembly members assert they will not wait for aggressors to threaten their territory and are prepared to take action to defend their constituency and restore order.
Q: What do the representatives demand from the government?
A: The representatives demand to be heard as legitimate elected officials, rather than being treated as pawns, and seek open discussions on pressing legislative matters.