ad
ad

Which AI Clip Editor is Best? - PART 1 | Opus Clip vs Capcut vs Minvo

Education

Introduction

In today's digital landscape, transforming long horizontal videos into shareable vertical formats is increasingly essential, especially for audiences consuming content on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Several AI tools have emerged for this task, but which one reigns supreme? Over the next few weeks, we are putting three popular tools to the test: Opus Clip, Minvo, and CapCut, focusing primarily on their automatic video framing capabilities.

This article is the first of a two-part series, where we will examine how each tool performs in terms of automatically framing videos for vertical formats. In the next installment, we'll delve into the manual editing features of these tools.

Opus Clip

We kick off the analysis with Opus Clip. After uploading a one-hour video, Opus Clip generated 31 clips. Upon inspecting a 2 minute and 51 second segment, we discovered that the tool primarily displayed a split-screen format. The host appeared on the top half of the screen while the guest occupied the bottom. Overall, the video was well-framed, keeping both participants visible at all times.

Some clips featured an interesting twist: the layout would occasionally switch roles, enabling the guest and host to alternate positions. While this automatic adjustment kept the viewer engaged, it wasn’t consistent, leading to moments of predictability.

Minvo

Next, we evaluated Minvo, which generated a total of 43 clips from the same hour-long video. The editing features in Minvo provided us with a variety of scenes, incorporating B-roll and dynamic video effects. As we examined the clips, it became clear that Minvo excelled in enhancing the viewing experience by frequently switching between the host and the guest as they spoke. This approach added dynamism to the content, keeping it visually interesting. However, it would have been nice to see some split-screen views as we tested the clips.

CapCut

Finally, we turned our attention to CapCut. Utilizing its premium features, we found that CapCut created 20 clips—significantly fewer than Opus Clip and Minvo. The primary framing style was a consistent split-screen format where the host and guest remained in fixed positions throughout. Compared to Opus Clip and Minvo, there was less variation in the presentation, which may not engage viewers as effectively.

Conclusion

This first part of our comparison illustrates the distinct approaches each tool takes regarding automatic video framing. Opus Clip predominantly offers a static split-screen, while Minvo impresses with dynamic switching and added effects. CapCut, although user-friendly, seems limited in variety.

Stay tuned for Part 2, where we will explore the manual adjustment features of each tool and see how easily we can enhance the automatically generated clips to better suit our needs.

Keyword

FAQ

Q: What AI tools were compared in this article?
A: This article compares Opus Clip, Minvo, and CapCut.

Q: Which tool generated the most clips from the video?
A: Minvo generated the most clips, creating 43 segments from the one-hour video.

Q: How did Opus Clip frame the videos?
A: Opus Clip primarily used a split-screen format but included sporadic layout changes where the host and guest swapped positions.

Q: Did CapCut provide dynamic switching between speakers?
A: No, CapCut maintained a static split-screen format throughout the clips, showing the host and guest fixed in their positions.

Q: What will the next part of this series cover?
A: The next part will focus on manually adjusting and editing the clips within each of the tools.